| you can`t find a site and then state that this "must be" where such and such occurred in the Bible. This is tendentious. the only thing that would "prove" that this is the place that it is reputed to be would be for written records to be found as well -- Anyway, the secular view of Israelite history is much more "Zioist" than the relgious view--since the wsecular view tends toward viewing the Israelites asw native Canaanites who evolved into the Jewish people. Professsor Zertal`s claims--including this one and the one on Mt. Eibal--are, without further concrete evidence--totally bogus. |
|
