| Does everyone here agree with Stephen`s views? I willingly admit I`m not much of an expert in military affairs, but still -- what Stephen says about Israel`s possible attack on Iran sounds like a terribly simplistic argument to me. "In this case a far more technological attack would suffice", "Nobody will be injured","This could lead to civil unrest, but at least it wont affect the health of the ordinary citizens, except those in hospital care where most electronic equipment will be worthless"... and so on. Is this really a realistic view over what might happen? No resistance from the Iranian side at all? In this case I think I`d have more trust on Mullen`s assessment of the attack leading to escalation and undermining the region`s stability. But I`d like to hear more of what you people think about this. |
|
