| Talkback | |
|
Title: | An odd criteria for advancement.... | |||
| |||||
| Name: | Johnboy | | |||
| |||||
| City: | Sydney | State: | Australia | | |
| I would have thought that if you were looking to see wether an analyst has The Right Stuff then you would ask this: "Has his work been accurate?" and not this: "Has his work toed the Party Line?" Because I would have thought that "being a heretic" is nowhere near as important as "being correct". Yet I look at this article, and it seems that the only criticism levelled at Freeman is: He`s a heretic! Burn him! Burn him! Because nowhere in this article does anyone say: His work always turns out to be wrong. Oh well, he`s anti-Israel, and so he has to go. Not that there is an Israeli lobby in Washington, of course....... |
| |  |
|
 |
|
 |
