not with the telephone converstaion the one terrorist had with the media...made FROM the chabad house... nor with another article that`s now saying the questioning of the captive terrorist has lead authorities to believe that "dawood ibrahim" is behind the attack. i`m not buying this one just yet. india wants desparately for this to NOT be an internally motivated attack... and the involvement of ibrahim makes it internal, no matter where the attack was launched from. this statement comes from indian authorities; NOT from the terrorist...and i`d LOVE to have been a fly on the wall of that interrogation room! and IF they were "were sent specifically to kill israelis to avenge the "atrocities" against the palestinians", then WHY, after over 48 hours of siege and combat, would this never once have been mentioned in ANY form whatsoever; INCLUDING a telephone call to the media in which one of them voiced grievances and demands? personally, i find it MORE than a little bit "odd" that the first anyone hears of this comes via a police interrogation of an attacker a full day after the attack`s over, when in MOST similar scenerios; he`d be dead! |
|