| If the Court decision to give part of that property to what the Court found to be the legitimate owners and order to what to be no legitimate owners to leave, why in the world everybody mention "jews" or "arabs": the Media, Haaretz, U.N., Carter, and so on. This is not a preposterous locution to promote racism and apartheid in a civil case? Are not the jews and arabs subjected to the judicial system in their jurisdiction, and be called each one:owner and...intruder, trespasser, or whatever the legal definition could be? |
|
