iirc the `international controversy` was comprised of Haaretz and little less. Although I I don`t fully agree with Aumman`s attempts to apply game-theoretical insights derived from his seminal work to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, they are `an opposition to a peace deal` only in the sense of an opposition to a *specific* deal. On the contrary, he tries to line out the form of the form a stable agreement (and negotiations) should take. |
|