...is Johnboy for continuing to harp on what is pretty much a non-issue. You`ve made this great discovery here, but this is purely a statement of OPINION not one of POLICY. Further, he isn`t really even threatening anyone. All he is doing is making pointing out the legitimacy (in his opinion) of bringing someone to court, even if that means abduction, should they threaten the citizens of a state. That`s it, and it really isn`t very much different than what numerous Iranian and Hizballah leaders routinely do: "If Israel does this... then we will do that." The only difference is that Nasrallah, Ahmedinejad and his mullah masters are in a somewhat better position to actually carry out their threats than is Rafi Eitan.
Johnboy, you are an apologist for whatever radical Islamic group happens to be making noise on any given day. You start out with the assumption that Israel must always be wrong and the Muslims must always be right, and then you build a phony case around that a priori position. I don`t know what your motivation is, but it certainly is funny for you to go around dismissing everyone who disagrees with your slightly skewed positions, or who finds fault with your rather simplistic arguments by labeling them as "Zionist apologists" who exhibit a "Zionist mindset". LOL. |
|
