Any time a head of state discusses the desire for regime change in another state, and particularly when head of state in question is the hea of a state that is pursuing nuclear weapons, still more so when such state arms and provides training and intelligence to proxy terrorists on the borders of the target state, such statements consitute a threat.
You really have to have your head in the sand, or be intentionally obtuse, to fail to see it.
Here`s an example I am sure you can relate to, as you`ve probably heard something similar before: If you hear a sentence that begins with "Now, I am not saying you mom is promiscuous, but....", you that the guy means your mom IS promiscuous.
Same here. His statement is like one that starts with "Hey, I`m not saying that we`re going to destroy Israel, but.....".
You know what he means. We know you know what he means. Why pretend not to? |
|
