| Talkback | |
|
Title: | So the argument is: attack Iran because it`s too peaceful! | |||
| |||||
| Name: | Michael | | |||
| |||||
| City: | UK | State: | | ||
| I don`t believe this. The latest insane gimmick of the Attack-Iran-for-Israel crowd is `It`s OK to attack Iran, because Iran has a history of restrained, non-violent behaviour when provoked`! Er.... I don`t want to point out the obvious, but if this is arguing that attacking Iran is a low-risk option because Iran`s too restrained to retaliate much, then by the same fact, there`s absolutely no justification for attacking Iran because they`re obviously too restrained to use nukes either. |
| |  |
|
 |
|
 |
