| Talansky is a successful businesman and Olmert a successful lawyer and politicians. One supports the other and all the crosscurrents remain between them. We assume that some of it was personal and thus , by def`n , corrupt. The assumption is probably right because Olmert is neither an angel nor a Jesus Christ. But then, is it right to accuse him of corruption or larceny for $10 spent for personals? The accusers become the corrupt and the accused the innocent victim. In short , bloggers be careful . Dont spout too quickly or vehemently. |
|
