The discontract reasoning that Sand has taken is mostly ideologically motivated. He knows that this raises of issue about legitimacy of the work.
The corpus of pushing the "land for all people" is not one of multi-ethnic, multicultural base; it is one of what the French Historin who in 19th century wrote the perenial :What compose a nation?
Sand sdhould know that and he also knows that the majority of one ethnic people, the Jews, have accepted the citizenry of the other ethnic minority the Arabs, it is this minority that is refusing to consider living in peaceful neighborhood with the majority: Sand, you know that in America, Australia, New Zealand the non-European late cmers to those lands have accepted the culture of the Ethnic masjority.
Just a word to finish: I recommend you to read Emmanuel Levinas the Great French Jewish Philosopher, and his also well known doisciple but who starte a new philosophy that you used so wrongly: Jacques Darrida.
By the way, you are still ignorant about the Historyglaphy of the Jews from North Africa and their Narrative; go back to Prof. Zafrani, Bensoussan, to HIDA, amd RABA (` Israel and the Humanity from 19th century). |
|
