| Talkback | |
|
Title: | #8 Well, let`s just put the truth to one side, hey Brad? | |||
| |||||
| Name: | Johnboy | | |||
| |||||
| City: | Sydney | State: | Australia | | |
| B: "Lets set aside the important argument that Israel has a historic claim that is recognized in international law to all or a portion of lands it occupies" Indeed, since there is no such recognition under Int`l Law because if there were then Israel would be a "sovereign", not an "occupier". B: "The occupation followed an unprovoked attack by all the Arab armies surrounding Israel." Untrue. This occupation following an attack BY Israel ON Egypt on June 5 1967. B: "Israel`s strategy was to fight that battle in the invaders lands." Translation: Let`s just PRETEND we`ve been invaded, so we can PRETEND this is a (!!) "preemptive counter-offensive" (!!) Nobody invaded Israel in 1967, but Israel certainly: 1) invaded Egypt 2) invaded territory Jordan considered its own 3) invaded Syria. B: "These invaders are now saying, o.k. we invaded your land, with a view to destroying your state, we lost and we want our land back." No, because your first 3 "facts" are wrong. |
| |  |
|
 |
|
 |
