For years since UN inception, has been used for/by political mantras to further their interest. The worst is to became human shields for terrorist to launch rockets or katyushas to another country.
Why didn`t the UN reprimand the Hezbulllah for terrorist activities? Another is why didn`t the UN draw up an agreement before any inspection? Don`t tell me it takes it has never crossed the minds of UN which consists of `World Intellectuals` for a minority to tell it what the agreement should contain?
1) Any military activity in the vicinity of UN inspectors would be taken as an act of aggression which would constitute an act of war which would authorize any UN military involvement in the country the inspectors are currently in.
2) UN reserves the right to indict the military authority of the host country for the illegal military violation.
3) UN reserves the right to impose a state of emergency on the host country until the situation is returned a satisfactory situation. |
|
