R: "hazbolla hid by post, un post communications said so."
No, quite incorrect. Communications between the Post and the UN command made no such statements at all.
What the zionist propagandists have beat up is a single email from that Canadian soldier to his ex-CO.
It said: "This has not been deliberate targeting, but has rather been due to tactical necessity"
And his ex-CO said that means - OF COURSE IT DOES - "we are being overrun by Hezbollah and the IDF are shooting at them".
Now, excuse me for stating the obvious, but if that is what he MEANT to say then why didn`t he SAY THAT?
It`s his ex-CO, so why beat about the bush?
If there were Hezbollah in the area then the IDF needed to make its people available to that Canadian Armed Forces inquiry to explain that, yes, that`s what we were shooting at.
Israel didn`t.
Why, Ralph?
Because all Canadians are anti-semitic?
Or was it because the Israelis didn`t have any evidence to back up their claim? |
|