| Talkback | |
|
Title: | Re #13 morals vs. psychiatry | |||
| |||||
| Name: | DJStahl | | |||
| |||||
| City: | HP | State: | USA | | |
| "...massacring prisoners probably was acceptable...is true historically about every army." Probably happened, but the scale matters, as does how much it was officially condoned. "...morals do not involve honor, trust and loyalty within the parameters of the discussion." You`re separating morals from honor, trustworthiness, and reliability? Why? Do you have a scientific reason? Consider Richard Lovelace. Or that cults classically try to break the individual`s attachment to moral practice as part of breaking his/her sense of self. Could just be retelling gossip, or even just giving ear to gossip. The sense of self, and of honor, is integral to being reliable in moral practice, and the reciprocal is true. This psychiatrist seems like one who`s achieved freedom from conventional moral qualities, and virtuous personal attributes. |
| |  |
|
 |
|
 |
