| Talkback | |
|
Title: | Iran attacks Briton! Missed it. | |||
| |||||
| Name: | joebhed | | |||
| |||||
| City: | harborton | State: | virginia | | |
| The talk is getting pretty loose when someone uses the label -attacks- to describe what happens when one country captues another country`s soldiers on its own territory. That is, actually, by definition, the opposite of attack. That is called -to defend. If the Brits caught some Irish soldiers on British soil, the UK could not be accused of attacking Ireland. Its a nice use of words, but, in my mind, propaganda. And the empty accusations that Iran is "using proxy terrorist forces" stands in contradiction to the Iranian efforts in support of the coalition forces, and against Al Qaeda and the Taliban from 911 until GWB insulted that support by casting Iran as a new global threat in the Axis of Evil. NONE of the charges contained in this post have ever been brought against Iran, except in the press, and if ANY of them were true this is what should happen, so that Iran can have a chance to defend itself against these charges. They are not charges, they are propaganda. |
| |  |
|
 |
|
 |
