| Talkback | |
|
Title: | Is Peace possible? (1) | |||
| |||||
| Name: | Dan Chazan | | |||
| |||||
| City: | State: | Israel | | ||
| As the process is defined now it seems to most (except Livni and Rice) that it is doomed to a failure. Most Israelis suspect that if there is agreement there will be a quick process which will result in an unstable Palestinian state. The term "terror state" was coined by Netanyahu. This is probably justified as there is not likely to be a great deal of Palestinian support for any measures requiring fighting the militias, as they do not turst Israel to do its part. On the other hand, I believe that there is a definition of peace (borders, Jerusalem, refugees) which can be acceptable to a majority of Palestinians and of Isralis. However for this majority to act it is necessary to carefully define the process. An outline of such a definition of the process is given in: http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000619.htm |
| |  |
|
 |
|
 |
