The court is ignoring human physiology and psychology. When a man is sexually aroused and close to climax, it is near impossible for him to think rationally.
If the woman wishes for him to stop, she must request that before she sexually arouses him.
Hypothetical: what would happen if the woman indicates that she would like to sleep with the man and she gives him liquor to the point of intoxication. Then, she requests him to stop and he is unable to do so. Would you say that there too he is responsible for his actions? |
|
