Blistering. Populist. Demagogic, shrill. These are just some of the descriptions of the ruling handed down on the Holyland case, by District Court Judge David Rozen last week. They’re mostly fair, but, then, the choice of words wasn’t a function of the gravity of the case in question or the importance of the Holyland project itself.
Want to enjoy 'Zen' reading - with no ads and just the article? Subscribe todaySubscribe now